Yes Vermont Yankee is proud to host the 209th edition of the Carnival of Nuclear Energy Blogs! Every week, top English-language pro-nuclear bloggers choose their most important post for that week. They present their selections at the weekly Carnival.
While the posts come from many blogs and many bloggers, a theme usually develops. This week's theme is Nuclear Energy in Perspective.
Perspectives on the Current Nuclear Fleet
First, two posts describe the on-going value of existing plants.
At Forbes, James Conca reported on a speech by Federal Energy Regulatory Commissioner John Norris. This week, Norris reiterated nuclear energy’s value as the best form of carbon-free base load in a diverse all-of-the-above energy mix for America. The speech was titled "Preserving Our Country's Nuclear Fleet."
In this post by Rod Adams at Atomic Insights, Adams notes that many currently operating nuclear
 |
| San Onofre |
- currently low (but highly volatile) natural gas prices,
- improperly designed markets that fail to recognize the value of reliable generating capacity,
- quotas and mandates that result in certain types of electrical generators receiving direct monetary payments in addition to wholesale market prices,
- insufficient recognition of nuclear energy as a near zero emission power source.
The impulse of nuclear plant owners to consider permanent closure as a response to current market conditions reminds Adams of a Jimmy Buffett song: Permanent Reminder of a Temporary Feeling.
A third post describes women who have achieved success in nuclear utilities.
At Nuke Power Talk, Gail Marcus follows a recent blog on women in the American Nuclear Society with another report on two women who have achieved success in nuclear utilities. Maria Korsnick is Chief Nuclear Officer at Exelon, and Sarah Kovaleski is Director of Engineering Design at Ameren Missouri. In addition to celebrating these successes, Gail notes with some dismay that things have not changed as much as she had hoped from her own early days in the field. The male/female ratio in the industry is currently nine to one.
Perspectives on Radiation and Radiation Releases
The first post quantifies the WIPP release
Some perspective on the 1.3 mCi release from the WIPP
At NewsOK (News Oklahoma), Robert Hayes puts the 1.3 mCi release from the WIPP site (due to the accident) in perspective. A quote from his article: In other words, the nearest neighbors to the WIPP site (which are ranches) received a larger dose just from breathing regular air that one day during the release than the entire lifetime dose they will have received from the activity given off by the WIPP release.
The second post fights FUD about Fukushima
The Hiroshima Syndrome's Fukushima Commentary
Japan Today rejects the truth about Fukushima. It says the truth is “obscene and vulgar.”
In this blog post, Les Corrice reports on a fear-mongering article in Japan Today. The incorrect article filled with fear-mongering references. Corrice attempted to post a response, which objected to only a few of the numerous misinformational issues. His response was rejected for being "offensive and vulgar." This travesty is laughable.
Perspectives on the Future of Nuclear Energy
Three posts on future of nuclear energy.
Two posts describe the status of proposed reactors.
Climate change and Ontario electricity: federal court clarifies the choice
The Canadian Federal Court recently ruled that in Ontario Power Generation’s plan to build new nuclear reactors at the Darlington site, the utility did not adequately address the issue of what will happen to the used fuel. Anti-nuclear groups hailed this ruling as a victory. Steve Aplin of Canadian Energy Issues sees it as a huge opportunity. Used nuclear fuel is a grain of sand next to the mountains of carbonaceous waste produced by nuclear’s fossil competitors. Not enough people are aware of this, and Aplin sees the new round of public meetings on Darlington as a forum to finally put to bed the trumped up issue of nuclear waste.
Florida ANS Students Steal Show at Turkey Point Siting Hearing
 |
| Current Turkey Point |
The next post describes molten salt reactors under development
Per Peterson has a modular molten salt reactor design in the US and is working with China's molten salt nuclear program.
At Next Big Future, Brian Wang describes how Per Peterson and his co-authors believe that the way forward for the US nuclear industry is to use new nuclear reactor designs with passive safety and modular construction. This will make nuclear power both cheaper and safer.
Per Peterson has a design for a molten salt-cooled reactor that couples to a conventional General Electric (GE) gas turbine. The Mk1 reactor design can generate 100 megawatts (MWe) of baseload nuclear power, but can also be co-fired with gas to rapidly adjust power output between 100 MWe and 240 MWe. The ability to rapidly adjust power output helps balance variability in the grid and is thus
attractive to grid operators. And because the turbine remains “hot and spinning,” efficiency losses to provide peaking and spinning reserve services are low. The thermal efficiency of this design in converting peaking fuel into electricity is 66 percent, compared to about 60 percent for today’s best combined-cycle natural gas-fired power plants.
Please spread the word!
The posts in this carnival represent careful work and communication by many people in the nuclear industry. Spread the word about this carnival! Tweet about this post, place it on your Facebook page, put it on Reddit, refer to it on Google plus, pin it on Pinterest. In other words
Spread the word!
The posts in this carnival represent careful work and communication by many people in the nuclear industry. Spread the word about this carnival! Tweet about this post, place it on your Facebook page, put it on Reddit, refer to it on Google plus, pin it on Pinterest. In other words
Spread the word!
No comments:
Post a Comment