About two weeks ago, I was invited to participate in a panel discussion. This panel is happening tonight in Brattleboro. The Commons of Brattleboro is sponsoring the panel, which is titled:
The path toward a post-nuclear economy. Life After Vermont Yankee: What's next?
I was unable to be on the panel, because I had a conflict tonight. I write more about the panel, near the end of this post.
A Panel Member: Dr. John R. Mullin
Of course, I was curious about the panel, though I couldn't attend. I studied the short descriptions of the panel members. (Double-click on the announcement to do the same.)
One name on the panel was new to me: John R. Mullin. He is a professor at University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and has an impressive Curriculum Vitae. On the panel description, he was listed as: a co-author of the 1997 paper “The Closing of the Yankee Rowe Nuclear Power Plant: The Impact on a New England Community.” With a short search, I easily found both his paper and a recent interview with him on Radio Boston: Lessons From the Closing of Mass. Nuclear Plant.
Economics and Property Values
I agreed with many of the statements that Mullin made on the radio program. He acknowledged that closing the plant has a huge economic impact, and similar jobs do not exist in the areas near the plant. On the other hand, he claims that property values fall because people are living "in the shadow of a (decommissioned) nuke."
Hmm...everybody was living in the "shadow of" a working nuke before! It is clear to me, despite my lack of a Ph.D. in urban planning, that when a plant is decommissioned, property values fall because high-paying jobs go away. Property values don't fall because the dry casks are still at the site. If the casks were at the site but the plant was operating and lots of workers were on-site...property values wouldn't fall. Well, that is my opinion anyway. In Mullin's opinion, the big question is: "Would you want to be living within the shadow of a nuke?" (From the Boston Radio interview.)
The Soul of the Nuclear Workers
Near the end of the 1997 paper on the Closing of Yankee Rowe is a section called Future Prospects for Dismissed Employees. This section notes that "There are simply no jobs in Rowe that match their skills, nor any local plants where pride of work is so high." Employees that remain in the town can expect jobs with less pay and less status. That is all true, and it is sad.
However, some of section seems to reflect some schadenfreude on the part of the authors of the paper. It seems to have a little sneaking joy in other people's misfortunes. Here's the quote that annoys me:
What is especially different at Rowe, however, is the degree of alienation likely for those who stay. Rowe and its neighboring communities were dominated by YAEC, and most employees seemed to think the plant would last forever. From this lofty situation to "just a job" is a real comedown. The decline in status will be particularly difficult because for years the Yankee employees often were regarded with some jealousy."Just a job," huh? Working at a nuclear power plant is "just a job" and the workers just recently found that out? When I read about the "real comedown" for the workers, it seemed to me to be mean-spirited. But worse; it missed the point!
The Motivations of the Soul
 |
| Firefighters from Wikipedia |
In most places, work of this type is accorded high status because people acknowledge the necessity of this work to keep the community safe. People also acknowledge the sacrifice that such work can demand. (Hail to those who carry pagers!)
Of course, these jobs are also a way to earn a living. Everybody has to earn a living. But many people who hold these jobs think of them as a calling. For example, my husband's family includes three generations of fire-fighters.
Man's Search for Meaning. Working in a nuclear plant is a "job" with the gift of meaning.
Vermont Yankee Workers by Cheryl Twarog
Let's end on a high note here, with a more upbeat quote! Cheryl Twarog, wife of a long-time Vermont Yankee employee, wrote this letter to the editor, which is appearing in several local newspapers: Vermont Yankee Workers are Great. Quotes from her letter are below:
Thank you for being the greatest group of people John has ever worked with.....
Thank you for remembering what is important, even at a time like this, when so many are jubilantly celebrating the impending job losses...You continue to go to work each day with the safe operation of the plant as your top priority, shutting out the ignorance of others. You are a highly skilled, dedicated and caring group of people, and you deserve all of the good that can come your way.Wishing each one of you the best.-------
More about the Panel
When the panel organizers asked me to be on the panel, my first question was: "Can you hold it a night OTHER than Wednesday night?" Well, they couldn't. I have a conflict tonight and cannot attend. It is important to me to share that I was asked, however. When I put the panel announcement on the Save Vermont Yankee Facebook page, there were comments to the effect that most of the people on the panel had never supported continued operation of the plant. So I need to state for the record that I am not on the panel because I had a conflict today, not because they didn't want me.
Here's the announcement of the panel in The Commons. The event is coordinated by journalist and Commons contributor Leah McGrath Goodman and her associate, Morgan Milazzo. I am grateful for the invitation.
Here's the announcement of the panel in The Commons. The event is coordinated by journalist and Commons contributor Leah McGrath Goodman and her associate, Morgan Milazzo. I am grateful for the invitation.
Alas, I know that Guy Page of VTEP (a frequent guest blogger on this blog) also had a conflict. I know this because he emailed me and the organizers, and the organizers immediately asked me if I could try to manage to attend. I couldn't. I am disappointed that Guy won't be on the panel, but since I can't be there, there is nothing I can do about it.
