Today, the American Nuclear Society blog, ANS Nuclear Cafe, started a series of posts that analyze Vermont Yankee's closing. Today's post is Reflections on Vermont Yankee-1. Seven authors have written their opinions, and their work will be published in three posts.
To quote the description of these posts: Seven authors – who have no official connection to Vermont Yankee, or to Entergy, have provided their opinions on the shutdown of the plant, its implications for the region, and possible implications for other nuclear plants in other areas of the country.
The authors are all nuclear advocates and/or pro-nuclear bloggers.
Today's post: It's the Politics, Not the Economics
Today's post has two authors. I'm the first author. My part is titled: The Price Is Not the Lesson. I argue that the statement "it's just an economic decision" works as protective cover for plant owners and it works for plant opponents. However, the real reasons for closure include political opposition and heavy, targetted taxation.
The second author is Les Corrice, blogger at Hiroshima Syndrome. His website hosts two blogs: Fukushima Accident Updates and Fukushima Commentary. Corrice is also author of two books about the Fukushima accident.
Corrice's section is titled: The Unspoken Reason for Closure. As he writes: "In my opinion, the economic rationale is a smoke screen for an unspoken, over-riding reason. V-Y has been under a socio-political attack for decades."
No, Corrice and I did not coordinate or collaborate on our posts. It's more a great-minds-think-alike situation! I encourage you to read the entire post at ANS Nuclear Cafe and to comment on it.
Other posts, with other ideas, written by other bloggers, will be coming soon.
-------
Yesterday, in the Valley News, I had a guest column on the front page of the "Perspective" section of the Sunday paper. In a few days, I will reprint the column at this blog. In the meantime, I hope this link works. Why Electricity Costs Spiked. (I don't control the illustrations for my columns, of course. I am pleased that this column is illustrated with a very nice picture of Vermont Yankee.)
Monday, January 19, 2015
Saturday, January 17, 2015
Video of Interviews with Vermont Yankee People
Entergy made a short video of interviews with Vermont Yankee employees. The video was filmed on the last day of plant operations.
Vermont Yankee was a well-maintained plant. It was a plant where people worked together. A sad video. But it is an opportunity to hear the voices of the employees themselves.
Vermont Yankee Employee Thoughts on Closing from Entergy Corp. on Vimeo.
Vermont Yankee was a well-maintained plant. It was a plant where people worked together. A sad video. But it is an opportunity to hear the voices of the employees themselves.
Vermont Yankee Employee Thoughts on Closing from Entergy Corp. on Vimeo.
Thursday, January 15, 2015
Timeline, Layoffs and an Insult
Fuel Removed and NRC Notified
On January 12, Vermont Yankee sent a letter to the NRC: it stated that all fuel has been removed from the reactor and placed in the spent fuel pool. It further stated that the reactor is no longer producing power. The letter was reported by WCAX.
There's a time-line to decommissioning here, and the letter is part of it. First, Vermont Yankee filed its PSDAR (Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report) with the NRC on December 23, 2014. (They had told the state of Vermont that they would file by the end of the year. The plant went off-line forever on December 29, 2014.) There is a 67 day comment period, during which people can comment on this document: the comment period ends on March 23, 2015. As I understand it, either on March 23 or sometime thereafter when the NRC accepts the PSDAR, Vermont Yankee will be officially in the status of "decommissioning" rather than holding an operation license. At that point, Entergy will be able to access the decommissioning funds for decommissioning activities.
Layoffs Coming Next Week
Meanwhile, next week, many people will be laid off at VY. How many people? I have seen conflicting numbers in the newspapers, and so I called Martin Cohn at Entergy this morning for an update. (For the most recent complete newspaper article, I recommend Susan Smallheer's article in the Times Argus.)
When I talked to Cohn, he explained that some numbers have not changed: There are 550 people working at the plant right now, and after the layoffs, 316 people will be working there. Those numbers have been announced for a long time. In other words, 234 people will not have jobs at the plant next week. However, as Cohn said, other numbers are more of a moving target. Cohn said that as of ten o'clock this morning: 40 people are retiring and 80 people are transferring to other Entergy plants. Of the remaining 114 people, only 8 people remain jobless, as of his knowledge.
Soft Landings Aren't All Soft
I am happy that so many people are having a fairly soft landing. Still, even soft landings can be hard. Many Vermont Yankee people are leaving the area, including leaving their friends, their kids' schools, their churches, their doctors, their favorite restaurants, their church choirs, or their poker buddies.
My husband's family moved cross-country when he was eleven, because his father lost his job. My husband still remembers, quite vividly, the sadness and dislocation, even though the new place was (of course) interesting and new. The new place was also difficult and odd and painful. His mother was especially hurt by the move: she had a very active engagement with her local church, and a basement with shelves full of home-canned fruits and vegetables. These fruits and vegetables could not make the move, and they represented something.
My husband was also hurt: the three boys that were his cousins and best friends lived fairly close by until they moved. As a matter of fact, while my husband's father was fighting WWII and my husband was a pre-schooler, my husband lived with these boys and their parents. When George was eleven years old and his father moved, these cousins disappeared from his young life, for years. Catching up with these cousins later wasn't exactly the same. (Though now, they all are great friends and visit every year or two.)
I have basically been so sad about Vermont Yankee layoffs that I have found it difficult to blog.
So, I will switch gears from sadness to anger. That might help. Alas, my anger is not about the plant itself right now. It's more personal.
----------
New Insults to Bloggers, Including Me
Now, I realize this may seem a rather self-centered section of the post. Skip it if you want. There are bigger issues, and I discuss them above.
This section is about an insulting blog post from an anti-nuclear group. Yes, insulting anti-nuclear posts are a dime a dozen. So why am I writing about this one? Here's the story.
On New Year's Eve I wrote a blog post, For the Happiness In My Life. In this post, I looked at the good things in my life as a way of dealing with the sadness of Vermont Yankee closing. My post started out with the statement: "To say I have been miserable about Vermont Yankee going off-line is putting it mildly."
A rather nasty anti-nuclear group put up a post on their blog called Nuclear Industry Goes Hysterically Ballistic About Vermont Yankee Shutdown. No, I'm not going to link to it...you can probably find it on-line if you care to read it. In that post, the author quoted a bunch of us pro-nuclear bloggers, including me, as examples of "hysterically ballistic." For me, he quoted the paragraph starting: "To say I have been miserable about Vermont Yankee..."
Well, that was a good example of "hysterically ballistic," wasn't it? (Sarcasm alert.) And yes, some of us bloggers answered and some of the answers got published and other bloggers got banned from his blog and it was all a tremendous waste of time and energy.
At any rate, when he quoted the pro-nuclear bloggers, he named the bloggers. Except for two. One he didn't name was "NEI blog" which kind of makes sense, though the authors generally sign their posts. They have a lot of authors. The other blogger he didn't name was me. I was "a blogger at Yes Vermont Yankee." He named the male bloggers, to put it bluntly.
Was this guy dumb and couldn't figure out who wrote that post? Or is he the kind of person who doesn't notice that women have names? I don't know. At any rate, I have added my picture and name to my blog now. I probably should have done this ages ago. Now everyone can see the person who writes most of the posts. Therefore, I suppose that some good came out of the situation.
And yes, I deliberately did not use his name in this blog. This was not an oversight on my part. It was deliberate.
On January 12, Vermont Yankee sent a letter to the NRC: it stated that all fuel has been removed from the reactor and placed in the spent fuel pool. It further stated that the reactor is no longer producing power. The letter was reported by WCAX.
There's a time-line to decommissioning here, and the letter is part of it. First, Vermont Yankee filed its PSDAR (Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report) with the NRC on December 23, 2014. (They had told the state of Vermont that they would file by the end of the year. The plant went off-line forever on December 29, 2014.) There is a 67 day comment period, during which people can comment on this document: the comment period ends on March 23, 2015. As I understand it, either on March 23 or sometime thereafter when the NRC accepts the PSDAR, Vermont Yankee will be officially in the status of "decommissioning" rather than holding an operation license. At that point, Entergy will be able to access the decommissioning funds for decommissioning activities.
Layoffs Coming Next Week
| Fuel Pool at Areva |
Meanwhile, next week, many people will be laid off at VY. How many people? I have seen conflicting numbers in the newspapers, and so I called Martin Cohn at Entergy this morning for an update. (For the most recent complete newspaper article, I recommend Susan Smallheer's article in the Times Argus.)
When I talked to Cohn, he explained that some numbers have not changed: There are 550 people working at the plant right now, and after the layoffs, 316 people will be working there. Those numbers have been announced for a long time. In other words, 234 people will not have jobs at the plant next week. However, as Cohn said, other numbers are more of a moving target. Cohn said that as of ten o'clock this morning: 40 people are retiring and 80 people are transferring to other Entergy plants. Of the remaining 114 people, only 8 people remain jobless, as of his knowledge.
![]() |
| Virginia Magnolia They don't grow in Vermont |
My husband's family moved cross-country when he was eleven, because his father lost his job. My husband still remembers, quite vividly, the sadness and dislocation, even though the new place was (of course) interesting and new. The new place was also difficult and odd and painful. His mother was especially hurt by the move: she had a very active engagement with her local church, and a basement with shelves full of home-canned fruits and vegetables. These fruits and vegetables could not make the move, and they represented something.
My husband was also hurt: the three boys that were his cousins and best friends lived fairly close by until they moved. As a matter of fact, while my husband's father was fighting WWII and my husband was a pre-schooler, my husband lived with these boys and their parents. When George was eleven years old and his father moved, these cousins disappeared from his young life, for years. Catching up with these cousins later wasn't exactly the same. (Though now, they all are great friends and visit every year or two.)
I have basically been so sad about Vermont Yankee layoffs that I have found it difficult to blog.
So, I will switch gears from sadness to anger. That might help. Alas, my anger is not about the plant itself right now. It's more personal.
----------
New Insults to Bloggers, Including Me
Now, I realize this may seem a rather self-centered section of the post. Skip it if you want. There are bigger issues, and I discuss them above.
This section is about an insulting blog post from an anti-nuclear group. Yes, insulting anti-nuclear posts are a dime a dozen. So why am I writing about this one? Here's the story.
On New Year's Eve I wrote a blog post, For the Happiness In My Life. In this post, I looked at the good things in my life as a way of dealing with the sadness of Vermont Yankee closing. My post started out with the statement: "To say I have been miserable about Vermont Yankee going off-line is putting it mildly."
A rather nasty anti-nuclear group put up a post on their blog called Nuclear Industry Goes Hysterically Ballistic About Vermont Yankee Shutdown. No, I'm not going to link to it...you can probably find it on-line if you care to read it. In that post, the author quoted a bunch of us pro-nuclear bloggers, including me, as examples of "hysterically ballistic." For me, he quoted the paragraph starting: "To say I have been miserable about Vermont Yankee..."
Well, that was a good example of "hysterically ballistic," wasn't it? (Sarcasm alert.) And yes, some of us bloggers answered and some of the answers got published and other bloggers got banned from his blog and it was all a tremendous waste of time and energy.
At any rate, when he quoted the pro-nuclear bloggers, he named the bloggers. Except for two. One he didn't name was "NEI blog" which kind of makes sense, though the authors generally sign their posts. They have a lot of authors. The other blogger he didn't name was me. I was "a blogger at Yes Vermont Yankee." He named the male bloggers, to put it bluntly.
Was this guy dumb and couldn't figure out who wrote that post? Or is he the kind of person who doesn't notice that women have names? I don't know. At any rate, I have added my picture and name to my blog now. I probably should have done this ages ago. Now everyone can see the person who writes most of the posts. Therefore, I suppose that some good came out of the situation.
And yes, I deliberately did not use his name in this blog. This was not an oversight on my part. It was deliberate.
![]() |
| Rally for Vermont Yankee, 2011 |
Thursday, January 8, 2015
Martingale Reveals Design for Mass-Produced Nuclear Power Plants
![]() |
| ThorCon Nuclear Island Entire structure is underground Thorcon graphic used with permission |
Martingale reveals a bold approach to solving the global issues of poverty, pollution, energy security, and climate. The ThorCon liquid-fuel nuclear reactor design is detailed at thorconpower.com.
ThorCon is a complete system of power generation modules, interchange maintenance, and liquid fuel service that produces energy cheaper than coal. Principal engineer Jack Devanney led a four-year skunkworks project that has created a new kind of nuclear power plant, integrating proven technologies with breakthrough approaches to manufacturing and licensing. Production can start by 2020. Today Martingale is publishing its design for cheap, reliable, CO2-free electricity at thorconpower.com.
Former MIT professor Devanney’s background in shipbuilding created respect for low-cost, high-precision, block-unit manufacturing at Korean shipyards. He saw how such prefabricated blocks could enable production of enough nuclear power plants to make a global difference, a hundred a year.
Author Robert Hargraves writes that selling so many power plants requires clear, simple economics, cheaper than coal. Coal is today’s energy choice of developing nations, now planning to build over 1400 gigawatt-size coal power plants to enable their economic development.
Lawrence Livermore Lab veteran nuclear scientist Ralph Moir says that today’s nuclear power industry is wedded to expensive solid-fuel nuclear reactors, even though the simplicity of liquid fuels was demonstrated at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Moir and Devanney modernized that design for mass production. ThorCon uses uranium and thorium fuel dissolved in molten salt to create a power plant that makes electricity cheaper than coal.
Stanford engineering alums Chris Uhlik and Lars Jorgensen contributed to the design of passive safety functions that operate without mechanical or electronic controls, even with no power. The reactor is 30 meters underground. Overheating drains the fuel salt from the reactor. There are four barriers between the fuel salt and the atmosphere. ThorCon is walk-away safe.
Taking another lesson from Oak Ridge, Martingale advocates a return to staged testing of physical prototypes for new nuclear reactor designs. This made the US the world standard for nuclear designs in the 1960s. Martingale supports adoption of the same license-by-test model that has enabled US leadership in aviation and drug discovery.
Martingale is designing ThorCon in the US while targeting its first installations in forward-looking countries that support technology-neutral nuclear regulations and see the benefits of the license-by-test process. ThorCon opens up a practically limitless supply of low-cost, reliable, carbon-free power by 2020.
--------
My contact for this announcement is Dr. Robert Hargraves, a member of the ThorCon design team. Hargraves has been a strong supporter of Vermont Yankee (I love his blog post Vernon New Hampshire about why Vernon should secede from Vermont.) He has many other posts at this blog, such as The Politics of Fear. I also strongly encourage you to look at his website: Radiation, the Facts.
While supporting existing nuclear facilities, Hargraves has continued to work on developing the next generation of nuclear plants. His book, THORIUM, Energy cheaper than coal, is a review of world-wide energy issues....and a proposed solution.
Discussion note. There's a great discussion of this technology at Rod Adams Atomic Insights blog post about the ThorCon announcement. Here's the link to the post: ThorCon --Demonstrated Molten Salt Tech Packaged with Modern Construction Techniques. Adams himself is the inventor of the Adams Engines (tm) which can use nuclear heat sources for a gas turbine.
There are more than sixty comments on Adams' ThorCon blog post: many of the comments are from engineers and material scientists. Much as I love to have comments on my blog, I think my readers will enjoy a better discussion by commenting on Adams blog.
Tuesday, January 6, 2015
The Blog Goes On: Five Year Anniversary
History and Questions
I started this blog on January 1, 2010. January 1 of 2015 was an anniversary, a milestone, and a decision point for me. I have blogged for five years at Yes Vermont Yankee.
But Vermont Yankee stopped generating power on December 29, 2014. Was there any point to continuing this blog?
For me, this was not a trivial question. There are many ways for a person to spend her time, and many worthy causes to support. I am also five years older than I was in 2010, and more aware of how we each have a limited time on earth. The plant has shut down. Should I keep blogging?
It took me a while to answer that question.
My answer is yes. I will keep blogging. I still have things I want to say. The blog has already morphed, to some extent, as I have begun to follow grid issues (including joining the Coordinating Committee for the grid operator's Consumer Liaison Group). The blog will change, but gradually. I will follow Vermont Yankee in this blog, but I will also follow other energy and nuclear issues.
Yes Vermont Yankee started as a local blog, and will remain so. The blog will continue to focus on energy issues in the Northeast. It will continue to be a rallying point for people who support nuclear power and reasonable energy choices.
The New Focus
The tag under the blog title has been: A blog about Vermont energy issues and in support of Vermont Yankee.
The new title is: A blog about Northeast energy issues, and in support of nuclear power.
Guest Posts
With the expanded scope, I also plan to have more guest posts. The blog receives thoughtful comments from many people. As well as comments, I hope to have more guests posts in the future. If you would like to post on this blog, please email me at mjangwin at gmail.
The Last Ship
My children live in New York and New Jersey. Over the holiday, part of the family took an expedition to see a matinee of a Broadway show: Sting in The Last Ship.
Talk about a busman's holiday! This was a musical about the closing of a shipyard in England. Meanwhile, back in Vermont...Vermont Yankee was closing. Frankly, this is a depressing subject for a musical, but the music was great, and Sting was great. I am very glad we went. The show is closing on January 24, and I encourage you to attend.
The shipyard in The Last Ship does not get miraculously saved. It closes. The Last Ship sails.
But the musical has a sort-of happy ending as the various characters come to term with their pasts, their loves, and their futures. I wish the same for all my friends at Vermont Yankee.
May we all have peace and joy and love and health and prosperity, even though the last Vermont Yankee electron has sailed.
I started this blog on January 1, 2010. January 1 of 2015 was an anniversary, a milestone, and a decision point for me. I have blogged for five years at Yes Vermont Yankee.
But Vermont Yankee stopped generating power on December 29, 2014. Was there any point to continuing this blog?
For me, this was not a trivial question. There are many ways for a person to spend her time, and many worthy causes to support. I am also five years older than I was in 2010, and more aware of how we each have a limited time on earth. The plant has shut down. Should I keep blogging?
It took me a while to answer that question.
My answer is yes. I will keep blogging. I still have things I want to say. The blog has already morphed, to some extent, as I have begun to follow grid issues (including joining the Coordinating Committee for the grid operator's Consumer Liaison Group). The blog will change, but gradually. I will follow Vermont Yankee in this blog, but I will also follow other energy and nuclear issues.
Yes Vermont Yankee started as a local blog, and will remain so. The blog will continue to focus on energy issues in the Northeast. It will continue to be a rallying point for people who support nuclear power and reasonable energy choices.
The New Focus
The tag under the blog title has been: A blog about Vermont energy issues and in support of Vermont Yankee.
The new title is: A blog about Northeast energy issues, and in support of nuclear power.
Guest Posts
With the expanded scope, I also plan to have more guest posts. The blog receives thoughtful comments from many people. As well as comments, I hope to have more guests posts in the future. If you would like to post on this blog, please email me at mjangwin at gmail.
The Last Ship
My children live in New York and New Jersey. Over the holiday, part of the family took an expedition to see a matinee of a Broadway show: Sting in The Last Ship.
Talk about a busman's holiday! This was a musical about the closing of a shipyard in England. Meanwhile, back in Vermont...Vermont Yankee was closing. Frankly, this is a depressing subject for a musical, but the music was great, and Sting was great. I am very glad we went. The show is closing on January 24, and I encourage you to attend.
The shipyard in The Last Ship does not get miraculously saved. It closes. The Last Ship sails.
But the musical has a sort-of happy ending as the various characters come to term with their pasts, their loves, and their futures. I wish the same for all my friends at Vermont Yankee.
May we all have peace and joy and love and health and prosperity, even though the last Vermont Yankee electron has sailed.
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
New Year's Post: For the Happiness In My Life
To say I have been miserable about Vermont Yankee going off-line is putting it mildly. People laid off, Vermont importing power from the gas plants in the states next door, opponents crowing that nuclear is just too expensive and this proves it. It's all too much.
Moving My Attention
As in other periods in my life when some event made me miserable, I have been shifting my attention by concentrating on areas of love and happiness.
Next year will be my 50th anniversary, G-d willing. Yes, I'm old. On the other hand, we married as undergraduates, so I'm not THAT old. ;-) I am deeply grateful for this happiness in my personal life. I am deeply grateful for my years with George Angwin and for my family.
In honor of the new year, I embed two videos about long-term love:
Sting--Fields of Gold
Goo Goo Dolls-- Come to Me
May your new year be full of love and health and joy.
Sting
Goo-Goo Dolls
Moving My Attention
As in other periods in my life when some event made me miserable, I have been shifting my attention by concentrating on areas of love and happiness.
Next year will be my 50th anniversary, G-d willing. Yes, I'm old. On the other hand, we married as undergraduates, so I'm not THAT old. ;-) I am deeply grateful for this happiness in my personal life. I am deeply grateful for my years with George Angwin and for my family.
In honor of the new year, I embed two videos about long-term love:
Sting--Fields of Gold
Goo Goo Dolls-- Come to Me
May your new year be full of love and health and joy.
Sting
Goo-Goo Dolls
Monday, December 29, 2014
Vermont Yankee Shut Down Today. Guest Post from VTEP
Vermont Yankee went off the grid at 12:12 p.m. today and was completely shut down at 1:04 p.m.
Brad Ferland of VTEP issued the statement below, and I am pleased to publish it here.
Vermont Energy Partnership salutes Vermont Yankee on final day of operation
Today marks the final day of electricity production for Vermont Yankee. Since its first day of operations in 1972, Vermont Yankee has generated low-cost and low-carbon electricity totaling about three-quarters of the electricity produced in Vermont. For 42 years, it has provided approximately 650 high-paying jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars of local and state tax revenue. The generous employees of Vermont Yankee have donated millions of dollars’ worth of time and treasure to area schools and social services. Today, the final day of power operations, the Vermont Energy Partnership salutes Vermont Yankee for its many economic, environmental, and societal contributions to Vermont’s quality of life. We wish Vermont Yankee management and workers a smooth decommissioning.
Brad Ferland, President
The Vermont Energy Partnership (www.vtep.org) is a diverse group of more than 90 business, labor, and community leaders committed to finding clean, affordable and reliable electricity solutions. Its mission is to educate policy makers, the media, businesses, and the general public about why electricity is imperative for prosperity, and about the optimal solutions to preserve and expand our electricity network. Entergy, owner of Vermont Yankee, is a member of the Vermont Energy Partnership.
-----
Some other links:
The Entergy press release on the closing, as it appears in the Brattleboro Reformer. The press release gives a concise history of the plant.
Entergy's VYDecommissioning page has a video thanking Vermont and many links to articles.
Nuclear Matters, a pro-industry group, also has a press release about the plant closing. This release could be described as "there goes grid diversity."
Rod Adams wrote a blog post about Vermont Yankee: the post expresses a lot of what we are all feeling. You may enjoy reading it. Should groups that celebrate loss of 600 MWe of reliable, ultra-low emission nuclear be called “environmental?”
-----
I find it personally too difficult to write about this today. Soon, I hope I will write something. Soon.
I decided to go with a natural gas image instead of a Vermont Yankee image for this article. We're all supposed to look forward, aren't we?
Brad Ferland of VTEP issued the statement below, and I am pleased to publish it here.
Vermont Energy Partnership salutes Vermont Yankee on final day of operation
Today marks the final day of electricity production for Vermont Yankee. Since its first day of operations in 1972, Vermont Yankee has generated low-cost and low-carbon electricity totaling about three-quarters of the electricity produced in Vermont. For 42 years, it has provided approximately 650 high-paying jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars of local and state tax revenue. The generous employees of Vermont Yankee have donated millions of dollars’ worth of time and treasure to area schools and social services. Today, the final day of power operations, the Vermont Energy Partnership salutes Vermont Yankee for its many economic, environmental, and societal contributions to Vermont’s quality of life. We wish Vermont Yankee management and workers a smooth decommissioning.
Brad Ferland, President
The Vermont Energy Partnership (www.vtep.org) is a diverse group of more than 90 business, labor, and community leaders committed to finding clean, affordable and reliable electricity solutions. Its mission is to educate policy makers, the media, businesses, and the general public about why electricity is imperative for prosperity, and about the optimal solutions to preserve and expand our electricity network. Entergy, owner of Vermont Yankee, is a member of the Vermont Energy Partnership.
![]() |
| Natural Gas The future of the grid |
-----
Some other links:
The Entergy press release on the closing, as it appears in the Brattleboro Reformer. The press release gives a concise history of the plant.
Entergy's VYDecommissioning page has a video thanking Vermont and many links to articles.
Nuclear Matters, a pro-industry group, also has a press release about the plant closing. This release could be described as "there goes grid diversity."
Rod Adams wrote a blog post about Vermont Yankee: the post expresses a lot of what we are all feeling. You may enjoy reading it. Should groups that celebrate loss of 600 MWe of reliable, ultra-low emission nuclear be called “environmental?”
-----
I find it personally too difficult to write about this today. Soon, I hope I will write something. Soon.
I decided to go with a natural gas image instead of a Vermont Yankee image for this article. We're all supposed to look forward, aren't we?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






